What am I doing? (in 1996)
This surely is an interesting
question.
Bob Dylan's song - wallflower - comes into
my mind - I'm standing in the smoky haze...
I doubt it will make sense to you
My-thesis-to-be
-
The complexity of type-1 recursive functions had been well studied in the
past several decades. On the theoretical side, the study had successfully
given a solid ground to the understanding of the structure of the
complexity families. On the practical side, the study gives the legitimacy
of many criteria, for examples, P vs. NP, or the asymptotic
notations such as the big-O
notation.
-
However, the computational behaviors of higher-ordered functionals are
still far beyond understood, theoretically, although the higher-ordered
functionals had been widely used in computer science very early on. For example, a programming language that allows functions as arguments
is a typical type-2 system. We need a way to characterize those function(al)s
in such kind of systems for a long time. The difficulity comes from the
lack of a feasible and solid computational model for type-2 or higher functionals.
-
We are aiming at the type-2 functionals. We want to give a machine-based
model, for example, the Oracle Turing Machine equipped with a clock, to
characterize the type-2 functional. Then, we examine the model and attack
its limitation alone the line of classical study with many prospects, e.g.,
Recursion and Sub-recursion Theory, Axiomatic Complexity, Topology, Formal
Method, etc..
-
Follow the study, we may have several applications. On the theoretical
side, we can draw a clearer line of computability in the class of type-2
functionals, and we can formally define the meaning of intuitively feasible
functionals. On the practical side, we can give an analogue notion of big-O
in type-1 for type-2 functionals, and we can analyze the complexity of
theorem proving in a formal system or
IIM (Inductive Inference Machine).
-
OK! OK! I am a father of two.
It's real.
last updated 1996